MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, better to write, easier to read.
PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, face to face skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as prone to find employment…..
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students will alter their higher education course while at uni….
Lots of people believe that it’s safer to learn something in a group in the place of individually. Do you agree or disagree?
Agree – learning in group has several advantages
Elements of teamwork may be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not dependant on others
More mature way, more responsible
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Many people genuinely believe that children should do organised activities in their time that is free while believe that children should really be absolve to do what they need to complete within their leisure time. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent tests also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it might be unfair for this minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to buy
-furthermore research has revealed that mental performance operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as for example studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many individuals say that globalisation while the growing quantity of multinational companies have a negative impact on environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your role.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…
Scientists believe that in order to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy inside their daily lives. However, most people have never changed the way they live. How come you imagine many individuals have never taken individual action? What could possibly be done to encourage them to do something?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy for the commons
– Collective problem – much easier to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What might be done to encourage them to do something?
– Media campaigns by the us government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……
Some believe that is the responsibility of men and women to manage the environment. Others say it website that writes essays for you for free is the national government that should take care regarding the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People should take care of the environment because:
We are the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – consumers are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Government should take care of the environmental surroundings because:
they will have the power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians of the country, this means collectively they have been guardians of this earth… yet not true in reality
Both should really be doing more!
In a lot of countries small shops and town centers ‚re going out of business, because people have a tendency to drive towards the large stores that are out-of-town. This leads to a rise in car use, and it also means that people without cars have limited usage of stores that are out-of-town. You think benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?